The role of fine motor skills in the assessment of early psychomotor development of children

Keywords:
оценка нейромоторной функции неврологическое обследование дошкольники тонкая и крупная моторика neuromotor assessments neurologic examination pre-schoolers fine and gross motor skills

Abstract

Introduction. Motor activity is a primary form of behavior and emerges in the fourth week of gestation as neurofibrillation of primary efferent myoblasts. Fine motor skills are particularly important in the study of child development, as they support a significant portion of highly organized functions (manipulative activity, self-care, work and creative skills, etc.) and are closely linked to speech development. The aim of the study was to determine the state of fine motor skills within the structure of other neurological functions in children at low perinatal risk. Materials and methods. This article presents the results of our own study design for assessing fine and gross motor skills in 3- to 4-year-old children at low neurological risk. In assessing fine motor skills, particular attention is paid to assessing handgrip. Thirty-one children (24 boys and 8 girls) aged 31 to 56 months (median 43.5 months) were examined. Results. All children with low perinatal risk aged approximately 3.5 years, generally considered “neurologically healthy”, exhibit abnormalities in at least one neurological indicator. Postural regulation abnormalities are significantly less common than coordination and gross motor skills (χ2=5.31; p=0.02). The most frequently observed gross motor skills abnormalities were sitting up from a supine position, trunk coordination (response to a push while sitting), and changes in passive muscle tone. Fine motor skills assessments significantly more frequently revealed handgrip abnormalities than hand coordination abnormalities (χ2=10.53; p=0.0012). Relationships were found between the studied parameters and speech development characteristics: the timing of phrasal speech development was positively associated with deviations in muscle tone and trunk coordination (r=0.55–0.6) and negatively with the volume of phrasal speech (r=–0.72). The volume of phrasal speech was negatively associated with changes in passive muscle tone, trunk coordination (pushing while sitting and standing), and grip type (r=–0.39 to –0.62). Conclusion. Based on the results of the examination of 31 children at low perinatal risk, assessed as "neurologically healthy," 20 children were found to be at risk for developing cognitive and behavioral disorders in adolescence. It is recommended to include the study of hand grip type in the neurological examination of preschoolers.

References

Пальчик А.Б. Лекции по неврологии развития. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2021. Palchik A.B. Lectures on developmental neurology. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2021. (In Russian).

Casaer P., Lagae L. Age specific approach to neurological assessment in the first year of life. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1991;33(2):125–138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1991.tb01533.x.

Einspieler C., Prayer D., Prechtl H.F.R. Fetal behaviour: a neurodevelopmental approach. Clin Dev Med. № 189. London: McKeith Press; 2012.

Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. Ed. by R.A. Polin, S.H. Abman, D. Rowitch, W.E. Benitz. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2017.

Herschkowitz N. Brain development in the fetus, neonate and infant. Biol Neonate. 1988;54(1):1–19. DOI: 10.1159/000242818.

Milh M., Kaminska A., Huon C. Lapillonne A., Ben-Ari Y., Khazipov R. Rapid cortical oscillations and early motor activity in premature human neonate. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(7):1582–1594. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl069.

Kamiyama T., Kameda H., Murabe N., Fukuda S., Yo­shioka N., Mizukami H., Ozawa K., Sakurai M. Corticospinal tract development and spinal cord innervation differ between cervical and lumbar targets. J Neurosci. 2015;35(3):1181–91. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2842-13.2015.

Welniarz Q., Dusart I., Roze E. The corticospinal tract: Evolution, development, and human disorders. Dev Neurobiol. 2017;77(7):810–829. DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22455.

Staudt M., Niemann G., Grodd W., Krаgeloh-Mann I. The pyramidal tract in congenital hemiparesis: relationship between morphology and function in periventricular lesions. Neuropediatrics. 2000;31(5):250–264. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9239.

Staudt M., Gerloff C., Grodd W., Holthausen H., Niemann G., Krägeloh-Mann I. Reorganization in congenital hemiparesis acquired at different gestational ages. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(6):854–863. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20297.

Martin J.H., Kably B., Hacking A. Activity-dependent development of cortical axon terminations in the spinal cord and brain stem. Exp Brain Res. 1999;125(2):184–199. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050673.

Martin J.H., Lee S. Activity-dependent competition between developing corticospinal terminations. Neuroreport. 1999;10(11):2277–2282. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199908020-00010.

Amaral D.G. The Functional Organization of Perception and Movement. In: Principles of Neural Science. Fourth Edition. Kandel E., Schwartz J.H., Jessel T. McGraw-Hill. N.Y.; 2000:338–348.

Пальчик А.Б. Малая неврологическая дисфункция у детей. М.: Медпресс-информ; 2022. Palchik A.B. Minor neurological dysfunction in children. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2022. (In Russian).

Пальчик А.Б., Андрущенко Н.В. Оценка психомоторного развития детей первых трех лет жизни. Д.И. Иванов, ред. СПб.: СПбГПМУ; 2025. Palchik A.B., Andrushchenko N.V. Assessment of psy­chomotor development in children of the first three years of life. Training and methodological manual. D.O. Ivanov, ed. Saint Petersburg: SPbSPMU; 2025. (In Russian).

Bayley D.B., Buysse V., Simeonsson R.J., Smith T., Keyes L. Individual and team consensus ratings of child functioning. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995;37(3):246–59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1995.tb11999.x.

Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. Third Edition: administration manual. San Antonio: PsychCorp; 2006.

Henderson A., Pehoski Ch. Hand Function in the Child: Foundations for Remediation. Second edition. Elsevier Mosby; 2005.

Largo R. Babyjahre: Entwicklung und Erziehung in den ersten vier Jahren. Munchen: Piper; 2017.

Vojta V. Die zerebralen Bewegungsstorungen im Sauglingsalter. Fruhdiagnose und Fruhtherapie. Ludwigsburg: Goetz; 2018.

Touwen B.C.L. Examination of the child with minimal neurological dysfunction (Clinics in Developmental Me­dicine). London: SIMP with Heinemann; 1979.

Пальчик А.Б. Введение в неврологию развития. СПб.: КОСТА; 2007. Palchik A.B. An introduction to developmental neurology. Saint Petersburg: KOSTA; 2007. (In Russian).

Hadders-Algra M. The neurological examination of the child with minor neurological dysfunction. London: Mac Keith Press; 2010.

Hadders-Algra M. Two distinct forms of minor neurological dysfunction: perspectives emerging from review of data of the Groningen Perinatal Project. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44(8):566–571. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201002560.

Peters L.H.J., Maathuis K.G.B., Hadders-Algra M. Limited motor performance and minor neurological dysfunction at school age. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100(2):271–278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01998.x.

Alamiri B., Nelson C., Fitzmaurice G.M., Murphy J.M., Gilman S.E. Neurological soft signs and cognitive performance in early childhood. Dev Psychol. 2018;54(11): 2043–2052. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000566.